prijava
SARAJEVO, September 17 (FENA) - Two people convicted of rape during the Bosnian war have voluntarily paid 15,400 euros in non-pecuniary damages to their victim - the first time that perpetrators of wartime sexual violence have done so in the country.
A lawyer representing a Bosnian rape victim told BIRN that the convicted defendants have voluntarily paid 30,000 KM (about 15,400 euros) in compensation – the first time that perpetrators ordered to pay damages to victims of wartime sexual assault have actually done so.
In order to protect her client’s identity, lawyer Nedžla Šehić declined to reveal the names of the defendants who paid the compensation.
Šehić said that the defendants’ property was pledged as a guarantee that the money would be paid.
The Bosnian state court has handed down over two dozen verdicts for rape and sexual crimes during the war.
When handing down verdicts, judges have recently started to order convicts to pay damages to the victim, removing the necessity for the injured party to file separate proceedings for damages in a civil suit.
However, this is the first time that such compensation has actually been paid.
Šehić said that it was difficult to ensure that victims received the compensation payments ordered by the court, as in 95 per cent of the cases, the convicted perpetrators say they do not have the money or have already disposed of their assets.
There are no legal mechanisms to ensure the settlement of such debts.
“Only in cases in which property has been pledged and temporary measures prohibiting the disposal of the property imposed can we see the effects,” Šehić said.
But now that courts have started ordering perpetrators to pay damages, “people are aware of that danger and they sell or gift their property in advance”, she added.
She also suggested that background checks on the assets of perpetrators, who often insist that their financial status is poor, are inadequate.
Bakira Hasečić, president of the Women – Victims of War association, also said that convicts transfer the ownership of their properties to others in order to dodge paying compensation.
“If they have any kind of conscience, if there has been anything human in them … they should voluntarily agree to pay compensation in the amount awarded by the court,” said Hasečić.
“As a last resort, their property should be taken, although they transfer their property to third parties in time [to avoid losing them as part of compensation payouts],” she added.
Lamija Tiro from the TRIAL International NGO welcomed the example that the case has set.
“We welcome this as the first case in which compensation for damage has finally been awarded,” Tiro said.
“We call on prosecutors to apply measures to secure property. We are educating prosecutors, as well as lawyers, about this subject, so they invest efforts to ensure that compensation that has been awarded is paid. We encourage other prosecutors to follow this example,” she added.
(FENA) S. R.
